Jordanian Journal of Informatics and Computing

ISSN: 3080-6828 (Online)

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs): A Key Enabler for Smart Transportation Systems and Challenges

by 

Haitham Albinhamad ;

Abdullah Alotibi ;

Ali Alagnam ;

Mohammed Almaiah ;

Said Salloum

PDF logoPDF

Published: 2025/05/07

Abstract

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are a specialized subset of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) designed to facilitate data exchange between vehicles and infrastructure. These networks operate in two primary modes: Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication, which is decentralized and mobile, and Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication, which is centralized and relies on Road Side Units (RSUs). VANETs play a crucial role in Smart City applications, particularly in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), which enhance road safety, reduce traffic congestion, and minimize environmental impact by leveraging real-time data collected from vehicle sensors. The unique characteristics of VANETs, such as high mobility and dynamic topology, enable critical functionalities like collision detection, traffic management, and emergency response coordination. Public service entities, including traffic police, ambulances, and firefighters, benefit significantly from VANETs by receiving real-time alerts and optimizing response times. However, several challenges hinder the widespread deployment of VANETs, including high vehicle speeds, data transmission delays, and cybersecurity concerns. Addressing these challenges is essential to fully realizing the potential of VANETs as a transformative technology in modern transportation systems.

Keywords

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs)Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs)Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)

Doi Link

https://doi.org/10.63180/jjic.thestap.2025.1.2

How to Cite the Article

Albinhamad, H., Alotibi, A., Alagnam, A., Almaiah, M., Salloum, S., & . (2025). Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs): A Key Enabler for Smart Transportation Systems and Challenges. Jordanian Journal of Informatics and Computing, 2025(1), 4–15https://doi.org/10.63180/jjic.thestap.2025.1.2

Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs): A Key Enabler for Smart Transportation Systems and Challenges is licensed under CC BY 4.0CCBY

References

  1. Lottermann, C., Botsov, M., Fertl, P., Müllner, R., Araniti, G., Campolo, C., ... & Molinaro, A. (2015). Vehicular ad hoc networks: Standards, solutions, and research.
  2. Artimy, M. M., Robertson, W., & Phillips, W. J. (2009). Vehicular ad hoc networks: an emerging technology toward safe and efficient transportation. Algorithms and Protocols for Wireless and Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, 405.
  3. Su, D., & Ahn, S. (2016). Autonomous platoon formation for VANET- ENABLED vehicles. 2016 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). doi:10.1109/ictc.2016.7763478
  4. Ferrari, G., Medagliani, P., Di Piazza, S., & Martalo, M. (2007). Wireless sensor networks: Performance analysis in indoor scenarios. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2007(1), 081864.
  5. Fotohi, R., Firoozi Bari, S., & Yusefi, M. (2020). Securing wireless sensor networks against denial‐of‐sleep attacks using RSA cryptography algorithm and interlock protocol. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(4), e4234.
  6. Huanan, Z., Suping, X., & Jiannan, W. (2021). Security and application of wireless sensor network. Procedia Computer Science, 183, 486-492.
  7. Yang, T., Zhai, F., Xu, H., & Li, W. (2022). Design of a secure and efficient authentication protocol for real-time accesses of multiple users in PIoT-oriented multi-gateway WSNs. Energy Reports, 8, 1200-1211.
  8. Butt, S. A., Diaz-Martinez, J. L., Jamal, T., Ali, A., De-La-Hoz-Franco, E., & Shoaib, M. (2019, July). IoT smart health security threats. In 2019 19th International conference on computational science and its applications (ICCSA) (pp. 26-31). IEEE.
  9. Deebak, B. D., & Al-Turjman, F. (2020). A hybrid secure routing and monitoring mechanism in IoT-based wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 97, 102022.
  10. Fotohi, R., Firoozi Bari, S., & Yusefi, M. (2020). Securing wireless sensor networks against denial‐of‐sleep attacks using RSA cryptography algorithm and interlock protocol. International Journal of Communication Systems, 33(4), e4234.
  11. Almaiah, M. A., Hajjej, F., Ali, A., Pasha, M. F., & Almomani, O. (2022). A novel hybrid trustworthy decentralized authentication and data preservation model for digital healthcare IoT based CPS. Sensors, 22(4), 1448.
  12. Almaiah, M. A., Ali, A., Hajjej, F., Pasha, M. F., & Alohali, M. A. (2022). A lightweight hybrid deep learning privacy preserving model for FC-based industrial internet of medical things. Sensors, 22(6), 2112.
  13. Babaeer, H. A., & Al-Ahmadi, S. A. (2020). Efficient and secure data transmission and sinkhole detection in a multi-clustering wireless sensor network based on homomorphic encryption and watermarking. IEEE Access, 8, 92098-92109.
  14. Aliady, W. A., & Al-Ahmadi, S. A. (2019). Energy preserving secure measure against wormhole attack in wireless sensor networks. IEEE access, 7, 84132-84141.
  15. Kaliyar, P., Jaballah, W. B., Conti, M., & Lal, C. (2020). LiDL: Localization with early detection of sybil and wormhole attacks in IoT Networks. Computers & Security, 94, 101849.
  16. Ding, J., Zhang, H., Guo, Z., & Wu, Y. (2021). The DPC-based scheme for detecting selective forwarding in clustered wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 9, 20954-20967.
  17. Safaldin, M., Otair, M., & Abualigah, L. (2021). Improved binary gray wolf optimizer and SVM for intrusion detection system in wireless sensor networks: M. Safaldin et al. Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing, 12(2), 1559-1576.
  18. Jha, S. K., Gupta, A., & Panigrahi, N. (2021). Security threat analysis and countermeasures on consensus-based time synchronization algorithms for wireless sensor network. SN Computer Science, 2(5), 409.
  19. Arshad, A., Hanapi, Z. M., Subramaniam, S., & Latip, R. (2021). A survey of Sybil attack countermeasures in IoT-based wireless sensor networks. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e673.
  20. Pajila, P. B., Julie, E. G., & Robinson, Y. H. (2022). FBDR-Fuzzy based DDoS attack Detection and Recovery mechanism for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 122(4), 3053-3083.
  21. Bendale, S. P., & Prasad, J. R. (2018, November). Security threats and challenges in future mobile wireless networks. In 2018 IEEE global conference on wireless computing and networking (GCWCN) (pp. 146-150). IEEE.
  22. Wang, C., Wang, J., Shen, Y., & Liu, X. (2018). An accurate Sybil attack detection based on fine-grained physical channel information. Sensors, 18(3), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18030878
  23. Osanaiye, O., Alfa, A. S., & Hancke, G. P. (2018). A statistical approach to detect jamming attacks in wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 18(6), 1691. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061691
  24. Yang, G., Dai, L., & Wei, Z. (2018). Challenges, threats, security issues and new trends of underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 18(11), 3907. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113907
  25. Adil, M., Almaiah, M. A., Omar Alsayed, A., & Almomani, O. (2020). An anonymous channel categorization scheme of edge nodes to detect jamming attacks in wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 20(8), 2311. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082311
  26. Fattah, S., Gani, A., Ahmedy, I., Idris, M. Y. I., & Hashem, I. A. T. (2020). A survey on underwater wireless sensor networks: Requirements, taxonomy, recent advances, and open research challenges. Sensors, 20(18), 5393. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20185393
  27. Shafiei, H., Khonsari, A., Derakhshi, H., & Mousavi, P. (2014). Detection and mitigation of sinkhole attacks in wireless sensor networks. Journal of computer and system sciences, 80(3), 644-653.
  28. Huan, X., Kim, K. S., & Zhang, J. (2021). NISA: Node identification and spoofing attack detection based on clock features and radio information for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 69(7), 4691–4703. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3071448
  29. Yuan, Y., Huo, L., Wang, Z., & Hogrefe, D. (2018). Secure APIT localization scheme against Sybil attacks in distributed wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 27629–27636. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2835527
  30. Ahutu, O. R., & El-Ocla, H. (2020). Centralized routing protocol for detecting wormhole attacks in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 8, 63270–63282. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983438
  31. Numan, M., Subhan, F., Khan, W. Z., Hakak, S., Haider, S., Reddy, G. T., Jolfaei, A., & Alazab, M. (2020). A systematic review on clone node detection in static wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 8, 65450–65461. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2983091
  32. Liu, G., Peng, B., Zhong, X., & Lan, X. (2020). Differential games of rechargeable wireless sensor networks against malicious programs based on SILRD propagation model. Complexity, 2020, Article 5686413. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5686413
  33. Xu, Y., & Liu, F. (2017, December). Hybrid key management scheme for preventing man-in-middle attack in heterogeneous sensor networks. In 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) (pp. 1421-1425). IEEE.
  34. Bhatt, R., Maheshwary, P., Shukla, P., Shukla, P., Shrivastava, M., & Changlani, S. (2020). Implementation of fruit fly optimization algorithm (FFOA) to escalate the attacking efficiency of node capture attack in wireless sensor networks (WSN). Computer Communications, 149, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.09.007
  35. Liu, G., Peng, B., Zhong, X., & Li, Z. (2020). Attack-defense game between malicious programs and energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks based on epidemic modeling. Complexity, 2020, Article 3680518. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3680518
  36. Altulaihan, E., Almaiah, M. A., & Aljughaiman, A. (2024). Anomaly detection IDS for detecting DoS attacks in IoT networks based on machine learning algorithms. Sensors, 24(2), 713. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24020713
  37. Modares, H., Salleh, R., & Moravejosharieh, A. (2011, September). Overview of security issues in wireless sensor networks. In 2011 third international conference on computational intelligence, modelling & simulation (pp. 308-311). IEEE.
  38. Periyanayagi, S., & Sumathy, V. (2018). Swarm-based defense technique for tampering and cheating attack in WSN using CPHS. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 22, 1165–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1162-1
  39. Huang, D.-W., Liu, W., & Bi, J. (2021). Data tampering attacks diagnosis in dynamic wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 172, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.03.007
  40. Ali, A., Almaiah, M. A., Hajjej, F., Pasha, M. F., Fang, O. H., Khan, R., Teo, J., & Zakarya, M. (2022). An industrial IoT-based blockchain-enabled secure searchable encryption approach for healthcare systems using neural network. Sensors, 22(2), 572. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22020572